|
Notes on Critical Black U.S. Performance
Art and Artists
Clifford Owens |
|
Contemporary black U.S. artists working
in the medium of performance art suffer a serious crisis
of meaning in art world culture because their work refuses
to be relegated under the hermetic rubric of black artistic
expression. In other words, black artists who don't primarily
make pictures and objects that look like art by black artists
often find themselves farther at the bounds than many black
artists. This may have something to do with the fact that
performance art, in general, defines itself as an indefinable
practice necessarily working against the art world establishment.
(After all, dealers don't profit from performance art unless
they inflate the value of performance documentary photographs,
hustle performance-based videos on DVD, a practice I find
criminal and exploitative, or sell dumb performance objects
as sculpture. And museums and institutions generally don't
fund performance art events because they are not willing
to jeopardize federal funding or take curatorial risks.
To my knowledge, no U.S. museum or art institution has ever
organized a survey of black U.S. performance art and artist.
I should say here that performance art is wholly different
than the "performing arts" which museums are more than willing
to accommodate because it can be read as black cultural
expression). Furthermore, black performance artists necessarily
embrace what many artists withdraw from: social responsibility.
Indeed, social responsibility is a distinctive feature in
black performance art production. But, the lure of the marketplace
has forced some of the most prolific contemporary black
artists who built there careers on race politics to retreat
from the battle field of social responsibility to the bunker
high art respectability.
William Pope.L, Charles McGill and Wayne
Hodge are interdisciplinary artists who have a particular
penchant as performance artists. They make visually engaging,
socially relevant and politically potent art without forfeiture
of social responsibility. They don't make slick art about
social and political black life that is bent to fit the
tastes of mass consumption. Furthermore, these artists are
among a distinguished group of black contemporary art practitioners
(Rico Gatson and Sanford Biggers are young artists also
working critically in the "performative matrix" who come
to mind. Gatson's work is particularly interesting in its
ability to retain social responsibility in its political
specificity) who draw on diverse artistic and intellectual
influences.
|
|
|
|
(above) |
(top) William Pope.L: eRacism,
Performance at Threadwaxing Space, NYC, 2000 |
(bottom) William Pope.L: Race
Becomes You, 2001, ink on plastic fabric 4' x
16'. Courtesy of The Project New York and Los Angeles |
|
|
William Pope.L, "black performance art laureate,"
to borrow a phrase from Lowery Stokes Sims, is the most significant
black U.S. artists working today. He has been a formidable presence
on the national and international visual and performance art scene
for over 20 years, but has come to greater prominence since the
National Endowment for the Arts revoked funding for his 2002-2003
retrospective, eRacism. Pope.L, "the friendliest black
artist in America," is a provocateur of the highest order. His
performances, installations, and texts penetrate the fissure of
race and class matters with critical mass. His cerebral performance
piece eRacism, presented to a large audience at Thread
Waxing Space in New York City in 2001 (in fact, for over 10 years,
variations of this work have been performed in a number of venues
across the U.S.) is no exception. The performance involved many
elements, including a spoken text about a racist encounter at
the supermarket, slide projections of his family members, 3 blocks
of ice, and the artist's body as conveyor of meaning beyond its
physical presence, his ripe body odor. Pope.L, donned in a salmon-colored
cocktail dress and distressed work boots (work boots and jock
strap are signature apparel in many of his performances), delivered
a highly discursive, critically convivial performance about racial
identity, social expectations, sexuality, and his familial genealogy.
At one point during the performance, after he removed the cocktail
dress to reveal a half-full, plastic gallon milk container that
was grafted on to a jock strap, he invited me onstage to move
a heavy block of ice from on location to another. I willingly
followed his direction, unaware at the time that he was, in fact,
indicting me in a critique of the ways in which class matters
inform and deform relationships in the black (African American)
community (if there is a black community). He was asking me, as
poor black people jokingly ask each other when it comes to supporting
black owned businesses instead of white owned businesses, and
as David Hammons asked viewers in his 1990 installation: Whose
Ice is Colder? William Pope.L made this point more explicit
in a text banner he created last year that, despite all efforts
to resist the temptation, Race Becomes You. |
|
I first saw Charles McGill stepping out of his
two door sedan parked in front of Gallery M on 135th Street in
Harlem. He was wearing golf argyles, a black Kangol cap, and dark
sunglasses. His persona was a Black Panther/yuppie golf aficionado
hybrid. He became race. McGill is a protean artist; he is an ardent
golfer and golf instructor who has managed to integrate that activity
into his art practice in a remarkably fluid way. I was at Gallery
M for the occasion of a panel discussion about black (African
American) performance art, held in conjunction with his solo exhibition
Black Baggage. The exhibition included fabrications of
a fictional line of golf products displayed in a glass case and
on shelves: golf balls emblazoned with Nigger 2000, photographic
images of black historical figures affixed to Titleist golf ball
boxes, a golf club festooned with the artist's hacked dreadlocks,
and a golf bag collaged with images of Huey P. Newton, Colin Powell,
and African slaves. The public performance component to Black
Baggage involved McGill (assisted by a white caddy named "Leroy")
hitting golf balls from various locations in Harlem; from the
hood of a discarded, charred automobile, from a pile of whole
watermelons placed in the gutter. A cleverly negotiated dialectic
of race situated in a geopolitical context, McGill transplanted
a presumably white male sport spectacle to the "heart of darkness":
Harlem. This gesture draws attention to the class exclusivity
and entitlement in golf culture, and deflects attention away from
monolithic notions of black male "genius" in other sport events,
particularly basketball. (The futures of too many young black
males living in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods are holding
fast to "hoop dreams" for class mobility). Of course, Tiger Woods
has supposedly broken racial barriers in golf culture; but unlike
Woods, McGill does not repudiate his blackness as a burden to
his representation, he embraces its contradictions and complexities.
|
|
(above) Charles McGill: Black
Baggage, 2001 |
|
|
(above) Charles McGill: Black
Baggage, 2001 |
|
The panel organized by Gallery M director Todd
Roulette included Charles McGill, Desiree Wallace, Wayne Northcross,
Anthony Meyers, and me. For McGill, the panel discussion was an
extension of his street performance. None of us were quite sure
what we were suppose to say about black (African American) performance
art, because no one knew what to say about black artists who make
performance art. Of course, blacks in the "performing arts" (song,
dance, theatre, spoken word, cinema, and television) have never
suffered a crisis of meaning in the culture: we have always and
will always be expected to sing and dance. As panel participants
stumbled over a few under-defined decades of black performance
art (our scattered conversation kept defaulting to the usual suspects,
David Hammons and Adrian Piper) Charles McGill sporadically, disruptively
in fact, announced through a small megaphone: "My name was never
Uncle Tom," "I have never been a runaway slave," "I have never
used a hot comb," "I have never been an invisible man," "I have
never had a dream," "I have never done anything by any means necessary."
If you consider the fact that McGill's greatest influence as a
performance artist is Malcolm X, it is no surprise that he issued
such confrontational proclamations in such a deft oratory style.
|
|
Wayne Hodge is a brilliant 26 year old artist
working primarily in installation, video, electronic music, and
performance art. He has a sharp analytical mind and an intellectual
curiosity unmatched by many artists in his generation. Hodge also
has a deeply profound sense of history. In 2000, when he was a
graduate student at Rutgers University, he performed a marvelously
complex work titled Banana Dance. Banana Dance was
a loosely constructed parody on Josephine Baker's sexually charged
dance routines performed in Paris in the 1920s, in which she directed
particular attention to her buttocks. Hodge's interpolation of
Baker's savage sexual performances simply involved the artist
engaged in a timidly repetitious Box Waltz with an attractive
white woman primped in a long, sleek burgundy dress. Hodge was
dressed only in a handicraft costume of irregular phallic banana
shapes attached to tight-fitted underwear, with thin black ribbons
tied in to bows around his neck and ankles. As the couple continued
to dance in a seemingly innocent manner, more sinister associations
began to unfold. There was a certain pleasure in discomfort with
the spectacular consumption of racial difference and sexuality
that outstripped a reactionary reduction of this as little more
than a simple case of jungle fever. In other words, we were forced
to re-think interracial sex and sexuality in more complex historical
terms, in ways that called in to question the representation of
a performative black female body in the early 20th century in
contrast to representations of postmodern black masculinity. Hodge's
performance was a courageous commentary against the mythology
of black sexual potency and prowess. |
|
(above) Wayne Hodge: Banana
Dance, 2000 |
|
|
To be sure, there is a great deal of critical
work to be done by black artists working in the battered and discredited
area of performance art. The challenge is to work against the
impulse to abandon rigorous political inquiry and social responsibility
in the service of grater visibility. William Pope.L., Charles
McGill, and Wayne Hodge are really "keeping it real." |
|
|
Clifford Owens is an artist working
primarily in video and performance art. His work has been
exhibited in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. He lives and works
in New York City. His collaborative video work with Young
W. Lee Dress You Up in My Love was shown at Fylkingen
in April 2003 as part of diSTILLation programme. |
|
(left) Stills from video Dress
You Up in My Love, Owens and Lee, 2002 |
|
Both William Pope.L
and Wayne Hodge contributed to Fylkingen with their video
works Sylligism (Pope.L) and Untitled
(Hodge) through the video screening programme diSTILLation
curated by Lydia Grey. |
|
(right top) Still
from video Sylligism, William Pope.L, 2003 |
(right bottom) Still
from video Untitled, Wayne Hodge,
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|